22 February, 2010

Kathryn Bigelow Personal item

Date of Birth USA
27 November 1951, San Carlos, California.

Kathryn spent two years at the San Francisco Art Institute. At 20, She was given a studio in a former Offtrack Betting building,and waited to be criticized by people like Richard Serra, where she made art Robert Rauschenberg and Susan Sontag.

She Columbia's Film School later graduated from . she won a scholarship to the Whitney Museum's Independent Study Program.

She was also a member of the British avant-garde cultural group, Art and Language. Kathryn is the only child of the manager of a paint factory and a librarian.A very talented painter,
IMDb Mini Biography By: Home Skully


The 2010 Santa Barbara International Film Festival hosted 'A Celebration of Kathryn Bigelow', which featured a retrospective of her work.

First woman to win the Director's Guild of America (DGA) award for Outstanding Direction of a feature film for The Hurt Locker (2008).

Is the fourth woman to receive an Oscar nomination for Best Director and the first woman to win Best Director at the Directors Guild Awards.

Taught at the California Institute of the Arts.

If there's specific resistance to women making movies, I just choose to ignore that as an obstacle for two reasons: I can't change my gender, and I refuse to stop making movies. It's irrelevant who or what directed a movie, the important thing is that you either respond to it or you don't. There should be more women directing; I think there's just not the awareness that it's really possible. It is.

 If you hold a mirror up to society, and you don't like what you see, you can't fault the mirror. It's a mirror. I think that on the eve of the millennium, a point in time only four years from now, the clock is ticking, the same social issues and racial tensions still exist, the environment still needs reexamination so you don't forget it when the lights come up.

Strange Days (1995) is provocative. Without revealing too much, I would say that it feels like we are driving toward a highly chaotic, explosive, volatile, Armageddon-like ending. Obviously, the riot footage came out of the LA riots. I mean, I was there. I experienced that.

I was part of the cleanup afterwards, so I was very aware of the environment. I mean, it really affected me. It was etched indelibly on my psyche. So, obviously, some of the imagery came from that. I don't like violence. I am very interested, however, in truth. And violence is a fact of our lives, a part of the social context in which we live. But other elements of the movie are love and hope and redemption. Our main character throws up after seeing this hideous experience. The toughest decision was not wanting to shy away from anything, trying to keep the truth of the moment, of the social environment. It's not that I condone violence.

I don't. It's an indictment. I would say the film is cautionary, a wake-up call, and that I think is always valuable.

I always want to make films. I think of it as a great opportunity to comment on the world in which we live. Perhaps just because I just came off The Hurt Locker (2008) and I'm thinking of the war and I think it's a deplorable situation. It's a great medium in which to speak about that.

This is a war that cannot be won, why are we sending troops over there? Well, the only medium I have, the only opportunity I have, is to use film. There will always be issues I care about.

You cast not for marquee value but for performance and talent. The right actor for the part. Anything else is a compromise.

War's dirty little secret is that some men love it. I'm trying to unpack why, to look at what it means to be a hero in the context of 21st-century combat.